|
Poster:
|
oneprowierdo |
Date:
|
January 16, 2011 11:57:39am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
that was a flashback I forgot all about joe hitting on suzy He was hammered!
|
Poster:
|
ringolevio |
Date:
|
January 16, 2011 07:15:29pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
I'm sure there's a moral here somewhere, in the juxtaposition of these two scenes ...
|
Poster:
|
William Tell |
Date:
|
January 16, 2011 07:20:32pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
Did you see "we" did it! J and I really have to bottle this!
|
Poster:
|
elbow1126 |
Date:
|
January 16, 2011 07:20:26pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
not sure about a moral but the juxtaposition is very familiar to me (start dream sequence squiggly lines. Ring will be playing the part of pretty much every living female except the one silly enough to actually marry me).
Ring: "I am sure there is a moral here"
LBo: "I don't care about a moral Ring, I just wanna kiss you"
Ring: "blaaaaggghhhhh"
SDH: " WTF another pair of shoes ruined!! LBo please stop doing that!!"
(squiggly lines)
|
Poster:
|
William Tell |
Date:
|
January 17, 2011 05:25:48am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
Hey!? I thought I am the only one that gets to write stuff like that?
|
Poster:
|
elbow1126 |
Date:
|
January 17, 2011 02:12:23pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
was it that bad?
|
Poster:
|
William Tell |
Date:
|
January 17, 2011 02:52:29pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
Touche!
Good one; hmmm, it looks like nobody cares about "it" these days, ya know? I must have done so much of "it", no one even notices.
|
Poster:
|
elbow1126 |
Date:
|
January 17, 2011 02:56:00pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
i don't think anyone ever cared. I think one putz wrote a bullshit post. I think everyone here gets it and wouldn't worry about it.
|
Poster:
|
DeadRed1971 |
Date:
|
January 16, 2011 07:27:53pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
Well at least least it was a request for a kiss, and not penis offerings ala Brett Favre via cell phone or Mark Gastineau in the locker room. The reporter said to Gastineau: "looks like a penis, only smaller." Must have been the steroids.
Don't forget Zeke Mowatt with the Pats years ago wagging his member-ship in the presence of a female reporter. I believe Victor Kiam; former Pats and Remington shavers owner, said "I've seen Zeke Mowatt's penis. In fact I liked it so much I bought the company."
This post was modified by DeadRed1971 on 2011-01-17 03:27:53
|
Poster:
|
elbow1126 |
Date:
|
January 16, 2011 07:29:10pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: JOTS (nonDEAD): why we need 1969! |
True, but it was on national TV and you gotta love the way he checked out Suzie's booty before telling the world what his intentions were.
Besides, football players are little leaguers when it comes to this. The NBA is where the real action is.
TVNews
OpenLibrary